The Michigan football program yet again finds itself in the news for something other than its stellar play in the 2023 college football season.
The NCAA is investigating the Wolverines amid allegations of violating rules that outlaw teams from scouting future opponents in person, as originally reported Thursday from Yahoo Sports. On Friday, Michigan athletic director Warde Manuel announced that Michigan football off-field analyst Connor Stalions was suspended with pay pending the NCAA's investigation.
Stalions is a person of interest in the NCAA investigation. He was hired by Michigan in May 2022 as an off-field analyst, according to his now-deleted LinkedIn. Investigators sought access to his computer for evidence of sign-stealing, according to ESPN.
Heading into its game Saturday at rival Michigan State, Michigan is 7-0 and ranked No. 2 in the US LBM Coaches Poll. Coach Jim Harbaugh’s program has won the Big Ten and made the College Football Playoff in each of the past two seasons. Since the start of the 2021 season, the Wolverines have gone 32-3.
Here’s a deeper look into the allegations the Wolverines are facing, NCAA rules on sign-stealing and in-person scouting, and any punishment the Wolverines might face.
OPINION:Time for Jim Harbaugh to drop the self-righteous act
The NCAA’s probe centers around alleged in-person scouting from Michigan.
Rigorously preparing for an upcoming opponent is central to the work done by college football teams and their coaches over the course of the season. To help with that task, programs are provided with video footage to scout teams they’re preparing to play.
What separates the Wolverines in this case is that they allegedly went beyond those traditional means of scouting. Anonymous sources cited by Yahoo claimed they used “unnamed individuals” to attend games of scheduled opponents and potential College Football Playoff foes to collect information on the signs used by those teams for their offensive and defensive plays. The Athletic reported Thursday that the Big Ten claims that Michigan used a “vast network” to steal opposing teams' signs.
Football teams often use hand signals and sign cards with pictures to relay a play call to the quarterback or defensive captain from the sideline.
In short, there aren’t any.
The NCAA does not mention sign-stealing as a specific infraction. Indeed, it is not mentioned by name and is technically not an offense except in cases where teams steal opponents' signs through electronic means.
The 2023 NCAA college football rulebook only nebulously mentions sign-stealing under Rule 1, Article 11: "Prohibited Field Equipment."
"ARTICLE 11. Jurisdiction regarding the presence and location of communication equipment (cameras, sound devices, etc.) within the playing enclosure resides with game management personnel.
a. Television replay or monitor equipment is prohibited at the sidelines, press box or other locations within the playing enclosure for coaching purposes during the game. Motion pictures, any type of film, facsimile machines, videotapes, photographs, writing-transmission machines and computers may not be used by coaches or for coaching purposes any time during the game or between periods. Computers, tablets, etc. are not allowed in the coaching booth."
In a section titled “The Football Code” in the NCAA rule book, it’s noted that “Only the highest standards of sportsmanship and conduct are expected of players, coaches and others associated with the game. There is no place for unfair tactics, unsportsmanlike conduct or maneuvers deliberately designed to inflict injury.”
Two of Michigan’s opponents this season told Yahoo that they learned that the Wolverines knew their play signs.
There’s precedent for sign-stealing accusations at the FBS level, even in recent years.
In December 2020, in advance of his team’s game against Clemson in the College Football Playoff semifinals, Ohio State coach Ryan Day praised Tigers defensive coordinator Brent Venables, now the Oklahoma head coach, for seemingly knowing what play the opposing offense is always running.
“Why that is, I don’t really know,” Day said at Sugar Bowl media availability. “But I can tell you he’s been doing it for a really long time.”
Day’s quarterback that season, Justin Fields, said he huddled to call plays during the Sugar Bowl to prevent the possibility of Clemson stealing the Buckeyes’ signs.
Unlike sign-stealing, in-person scouting is explicitly forbidden, which is why Michigan could potentially be in trouble with college sports’ governing body.
Under the umbrella of “Scouting of Opponents” in the 2023-24 NCAA Division I Manual, bylaw 11.6.1 states that “off-campus, in-person scouting of future opponents (in the same season) is prohibited.”
There are exceptions to the rule outlined in corresponding bylaws, 11.6.1.1 and 11.6.1.2:
In 1994, in-person scouting was prohibited by the NCAA in all cases beyond those two aforementioned exceptions. It was instituted as a cost-saving measure for programs that were paying to send assistant coaches and various staff members to future opponents’ games.
As with any violation of NCAA rules and bylaws, Michigan could face punishment from the NCAA if the organization finds these allegations to be true.
However, no specific penalty is listed in the NCAA manual for impermissible in-person scouting.
When asked to specify what level violation in-person scouting is (and what penalties would be associated with it), an NCAA spokesperson told the USA TODAY Network that the governing body would not comment on Michigan's specific case:
“The NCAA will not comment on specific cases or investigations at this time. The Association will continue to collaborate with member schools and conferences on any possible issues that could impact fair competition.”
Michigan released the following statement from Harbaugh in relation to the NCAA investigation:
"I want to make it clear that I, and my staff, will fully cooperate with the investigation into this matter.
"I do not have any knowledge or information regarding the University of Michigan football program illegally stealing signals, nor have I directed any staff member or others to participate in an off-campus scouting assignment. I have no awareness of anyone on our staff having done that or having directed that action.
"I do not condone or tolerate anyone doing anything illegal or against NCAA rules.
"No matter what program or organization that I have led throughout my career, my instructions and awareness of how we scout opponents have always been firmly within the rules.
"Pursuant to NCAA rules, I will not be able to comment further while this investigation takes place."
In response to Thursday’s breaking news about the NCAA investigation, the Big Ten released the following statement:
"Late Wednesday afternoon, the Big Ten Conference and University of Michigan were notified by the NCAA that the NCAA was investigating allegations of sign stealing by the University of Michigan football program. The Big Ten Conference has notified Michigan State University and future opponents. The Big Ten Conference considers the integrity of competition to be of utmost importance and will continue to monitor the investigation. The Conference will have no further comment at this time."
Compounding Michigan’s issues is the fact the program is already under NCAA investigation for a different matter.
The probe is centered around four Level II violations pertaining to recruiting. Harbaugh allegedly met with recruits during a designated dead period during the COVID-19 pandemic, used too many coaches during practices and watched player workouts on Zoom.
In response to that investigation, Michigan and NCAA purportedly agreed to a four-game suspension, an agreement that ultimately fell through. In response, the university self-imposed a three-game suspension on Harbaugh for the first three games of the 2023 college football season: victories against East Carolina, UNLV and Bowling Green, in which the Wolverines won by a combined 96-16 margin.
A ruling from the NCAA on the potential recruiting violations isn’t expected until 2024.
