Current:Home > MyWisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid-VaTradeCoin
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
lotradecoin payouts View Date:2024-12-25 23:00:26
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday on whether a law that legislators adopted more than a decade before the Civil War bans abortion and can still be enforced.
Abortion-rights advocates stand an excellent chance of prevailing, given that liberal justices control the court and one of them remarked on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Monday’s arguments are little more than a formality ahead of a ruling, which is expected to take weeks.
Wisconsin lawmakers passed the state’s first prohibition on abortion in 1849. That law stated that anyone who killed a fetus unless the act was to save the mother’s life was guilty of manslaughter. Legislators passed statutes about a decade later that prohibited a woman from attempting to obtain her own miscarriage. In the 1950s, lawmakers revised the law’s language to make killing an unborn child or killing the mother with the intent of destroying her unborn child a felony. The revisions allowed a doctor in consultation with two other physicians to perform an abortion to save the mother’s life.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling legalizing abortion nationwide nullified the Wisconsin ban, but legislators never repealed it. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe two years ago, conservatives argued that the Wisconsin ban was enforceable again.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit challenging the law in 2022. He argued that a 1985 Wisconsin law that allows abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb supersedes the ban. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, argues the 1849 ban should be enforceable. He contends that it was never repealed and that it can co-exist with the 1985 law because that law didn’t legalize abortion at any point. Other modern-day abortion restrictions also don’t legalize the practice, he argues.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled last year that the old ban outlaws feticide — which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother’s consent — but not consensual abortions. The ruling emboldened Planned Parenthood to resume offering abortions in Wisconsin after halting procedures after Roe was overturned.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court in February to overturn Schlipper’s ruling without waiting for lower appellate courts to rule first. The court agreed to take the case in July.
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin filed a separate lawsuit in February asking the state Supreme Court to rule directly on whether a constitutional right to abortion exists in the state. The court agreed in July to take that case as well. The justices have yet to schedule oral arguments.
Persuading the court’s liberal majority to uphold the ban appears next to impossible. Liberal Justice Janet Protasiewicz stated openly during her campaign that she supports abortion rights, a major departure for a judicial candidate. Usually, such candidates refrain from speaking about their personal views to avoid the appearance of bias.
The court’s three conservative justices have accused the liberals of playing politics with abortion.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- 'September 5' depicts shocking day when terrorism arrived at the Olympics
- Appeals court takes up transgender health coverage case likely headed to Supreme Court
- Suspect suffers life-threatening injuries in ‘gunfight’ with Missouri officers
- Fox founder Rupert Murdoch steps down from global media empire
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- MILAN FASHION PHOTOS: Benetton reaches across generations with mix-matched florals and fruity motifs
- Raiders All-Pro Davante Adams rips Bills DB for hit: That's why you're 'not on the field'
- Wisconsin DNR defends lack of population goal in wolf management plan
- Albertsons gives up on Kroger merger and sues the grocery chain for failing to secure deal
- Extreme heat, coupled with chronic health issues, is killing elderly New Yorkers
Ranking
- Drew Barrymore has been warned to 'back off' her guests after 'touchy' interviews
- Mississippi River water levels plummet for second year: See the impact it's had so far
- Why was a lion cub found by a roadside in northern Serbia? Police are trying to find out
- Los Angeles Rams trade disgruntled RB Cam Akers to Minnesota Vikings
- What was 2024's best movie? From 'The Substance' to 'Conclave,' our top 10
- Nicki Minaj’s Husband Kenneth Petty Ordered to Serve House Arrest After Threatening Offset
- NSYNC reunion gets spicy with upcoming 'Hot Ones' appearance: Watch the teaser
- Indiana Republican state senator Jack Sandlin, a former police officer, dies at age 72
Recommendation
-
China's ruling Communist Party expels former chief of sports body
-
Diplo Weighs In on Sophie Turner and Joe Jonas’ Divorce After Live-Streaming Their Vegas Wedding
-
Man thought he was being scammed after winning $4 million from Michigan Lottery scratch-off game
-
Afghans who recently arrived in US get temporary legal status from Biden administration
-
The burial site of the people Andrew Jackson enslaved was lost. The Hermitage says it is found
-
Minnesota approves giant solar energy project near Minneapolis
-
Amazon product launch: From Echo to Alexa, the connected smart home may soon be a reality
-
How your college major can influence pay. Here are the top- and bottom-paying fields.