A Kroger-Albertsons merger means lower prices and more jobs. Let it happen.

In the latest edition of “Rich States, Poor States,” an annual report assessing state economic performance across several categories, Arizona ranks third nationally for economic performance.  

The lofty ranking can in part be attributed to Arizona policymakers’ commitment to marketplace competition and a lighter regulatory burden on job creators.  

That commitment has resulted not only in more jobs but also has benefited Arizonans with more choices and lower prices.  

A Kroger-Albertsons merger makes sense

Perhaps no sector of our economy is as competitive as the grocery industry.

No longer limited to traditional grocery stores, concepts like supercenters, membership clubs and online grocers have entered the field to compete for a spot in consumers’ household budgets.   

The competition is fierce. Grocers need to be innovative to survive. Some, like Kroger and Albertsons, which own Fry’s and Safeway, respectively, want to team up. 

A Kroger-Albertsons merger makes sense. 

Consider that Walmart is the largest grocer in the world and in the United States, where the company’s 30% national share is more than double a combined Kroger and Albertsons.

Back off, FTC.Suing to stop Kroger-Albertsons merger exemplifies bumbling bureaucracy.

The same goes for Arizona, where, just like nationally, Walmart has a bigger market share than even a combined Kroger and Albertsons would.  

Amazon, Costco, Target and Aldi have all grown their offerings in Arizona as well.  

Merger would ensure stores stay open

With all this competition that delivers Arizona shoppers wide selections at various price points, why is Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes suing to stop a combined Kroger and Albertsons by relying on a law intended to stop monopolies?  

Mayes and opponents of the proposed merger say they’re looking out for consumers and workers, but they’re doing more harm than good.  

After all, if Kroger and Albertsons can’t keep pace in their current form, then stores will close, leaving shoppers with fewer choices and workers out of a job. 

Under a merger, Kroger and Albertsons have committed to not close stores.

To meet competition requirements, they would sell some stores to C&S Wholesale Grocers. The national network already supplies more than 7,500 independent grocery stores. It also owns the Piggly Wiggly and Grand Union grocery brands.  

Various stores in Arizona are part of the sale, meaning more choices for consumers and saved jobs, including union jobs. C&S said it will continue to recognize the union workforce and maintain all collective bargaining agreements. 

Kroger also has promised to lower prices

Claims of price hikes don’t add up, either. 

Kroger has lowered prices following other acquisitions. Over the past 20 years, Kroger has reduced its gross profit margin significantly to lower prices for customers by $5 billion. 

As part of the merger with Albertsons, Kroger has committed an additional $500 million to continue lowering prices after the transaction is completed. 

Warning for US economy:Small businesses are cutting jobs

Mayes and opponents say they’re responding to consumers’ concerns and worries. But their rhetoric around the proposed merger contradicts the public commitments Kroger has made since the merger was announced.

And that only contributes to the consumer anxiety opponents cite as justification for seeking to block the deal. 

Kroger and Albertsons have made strong commitments to preserve jobs and shopper choice. We would expect the attorney general and opponents to hold them accountable for keeping their end of the bargain. 

Two grocery companies have assessed the market conditions and have concluded that a merger makes the most sense for their continued survival.  

Let the market determine whether they’ve made the right calculation.

Danny Seiden is president and CEO of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry. This column originally appeared in The Arizona Republic.